Legal Opinion
Peerless Insurance v. Frederick
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 23, 2004No. 03-039PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. This action involves various insurance claims resulting from a fire that destroyed a building in which appellant, Young Buck Enterprises (Young Buck), operated the Bennington Station Restaurant. Young Buck leased the property from MacDonald & Secor Realty, Inc. (M&S). The suit began as a subrogation action between M&S’s insurer, Peerless Insurance Company (Peerless), and the lessee, Young Buck. Young Buck denied liability and counterclaimed, alleging fraudulent inducement to purchase insurance, wrongful denial of insurance coverage, and insurer bad faith based on the filing of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Doe v. ForrestSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- United Fire Insurance v. McClellandNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Greene v. Stevens Gas ServiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Bushey v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Monahan v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- In Re Miller Subdivision Final PlanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Edson v. Barre Supervisory Union 61Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- R.L. Vallee, Inc. v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2006
- Murphy v. Patriot Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.