Legal Opinion

Gafford v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 2003No. CA 03-382PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olly Neal, Judge.

Appellant, Wayne Gafford, appeals the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s grant of appellee Philip Cox’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, he argues that the grant of summary judgment was improper because the exclusive remedy provision, of Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-105 (Repl. 2002) does not apply to the facts of this case. We affirm.

Appellant and appellee worked for Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears). On July 2, 1999, appellant was a passenger in a vehicle owned by Sears that was being driven by appellee to a service call. While en route, they were involved in an automobile…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neal v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. King v. CardinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Simmons First National Bank v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Allen v. KizerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Chamberlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelms v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Billings v. Aeropres Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007
  3. Sherwood Forest Mobile Home Park v. Champion Home Builders Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Bennie Burks, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Oliver Lee Burks v. Hunter L. Brown, M.D., and Robert T. Emery, M.D.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API