Legal Opinion
Grempler v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Harford County, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 5, 1970No. [No. 392, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
“The Realtor should so conduct his business as to avoid controversies with his fellow-Real tors; but, in the event of a controversy between Realtors who are members of the same real estate board, such controversy should be submitted for arbitration in accordance with regulations of their board and not to a suit at law. The decision in such arbitration, should be accepted as final and binding.”
Article 22, Brokers’ Code of Ethics. 1
Ignoring both the spirit and the letter of this directive, a group of realtors in Harford County have brought to court the question of whether a restrictive multiple…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Falcone v. Middlesex County Medical SocietySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. PalssonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. Realty Multi-List, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bd. of Regents, Etc. v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- New York v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Karen E. Cardoza v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.