Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Astrue

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided February 6, 2012No. Civil Case No. 2:09cv54PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act and the Social Security Act [Doc. 21] and Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees under the Social Security Act [Doc. 26].

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 22, 2010, this matter was remanded to the Social Security Administration pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) on the Defendant’s unopposed motion for reversal and remand for further administrative proceedings. [Doc. 18]. On January 14, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a motion for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Andria Priestley v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API