Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Lashly v. Wurdeman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1914Published

Mandamus. Original Proceeding.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION.

REYNOLDS, P. J.

One Hornberg, on January 21, 1914, filed with the clerk of the county court of St. Louis county his petition, bond and affidavit for a dramshop license. These being duly presented to the county court, that court refused to try, hear, or determine the right of applicant to a license. Thereupon Hornberg filed a petition in the circuit court "or a writ of mandamus against the judges of the "ounty court to compel them to proceed in the matter of his petition and to hear, try and determine his right to a dramshop. This petition was duly assigned to division No. 2…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Commissioners v. SellewSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. State v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. St. Louis County Court v. SparksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846
  4. State ex rel. Morse v. BurckharttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API