Legal Opinion

El-Ad 250 West LLC v. 30 Hubert Street LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. *521Ramos, J.), entered February 26, 2009, declaring that defendant is in default under the parties’ purchase and sale agreement and that plaintiff properly terminated the agreement and is entitled to receive the escrowed deposit, and dismissing defendant’s first counterclaim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances, defendant’s notice to cure, delivered to plaintiff one day before the time-of-the-essence closing date, was insufficient to place plaintiff in actionable default under the purchase and sale agreement, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Willow Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Phoenix Capital Investments LLC v. Ellington Management Group, L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fewer v. GFI Group Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. 225 5th, LLC v. VolynetsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P. v. GuptaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. 225 5th, LLC v. VolynetsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API