Legal Opinion

Quertermous v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 2001No. 2-00-142-CV, 2-00-143-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Appellant Michael Quertermous appeals from the trial court’s orders denying his petitions for, expunction. In two points, Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his expunction requests and that he was entitled to full expunction in both cases. We affirm.

On May 4, 1999, Appellant filed two ex parte petitions for expunction of records in Tarrant County district court. According to his petitions, in 1993, Appellant, a juvenile, was taken into custody by the Arlington Police Department for the offenses of possession of a weapon in a prohibited place and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris County District Attorney v. Lacafta, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Harris County District Attorney's Office v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. State v. Autumn Hills Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Ex Parte Myers, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Heine v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  2. City of Arlington v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Barker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Ex Parte Jared Scott EngerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API