Legal Opinion

State v. Vang

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 6, 2003No. 3587PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

James Vang was convicted of murder, conspiracy to commit armed robbery, and armed robbery. He appeals arguing he is entitled to a new trial. We affirm.

FACTS

On June 23, 1997, James Vang, Curtis Kesl, Kai Yang, and Ae Khingratsaiphon drove from Charlotte, North Carolina to Aiken, South Carolina to rob the Southside Pawn Shop. The original plan was for Yang to handcuff Carlton Ennis, the owner of the store, and rob him at gunpoint. However, once the men were in the store, Yang did not follow through on the plan and exited the store. The men left the scene and decided to drive around.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. AldretSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. RosemondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MartucciCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. BeatySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. DialCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. BeatySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API