Legal Opinion · Dissent

City Loan & Savings Co. v. Buckley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1945No. 30206Published

1DissentHart, J.

I agree that, under the Youngstown Municipal Court Act, fees of jurors are to be paid out of the city treasury in the first instance, and that the treasury is entitled to reimbursement from the party to the suit against whom such costs are properly assessed. My dissent relates to what is meant by jury fees which may be taxed as costs under the statute.

Statutes assessing costs, like statutes assessing taxes, must be strictly construed in favor of the litigant against whom they are assessed. The statute in question provides that jury fees shall be taxed as costs against the unsuccessful party.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. NewmarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Marvin v. District Court of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. State v. VoorhiesWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Greene v. SmitherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Marsh v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API