Legal Opinion
Williams v. Armour Car Lines
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 17, 1906No. 32PublishedCited by 5 opinions
to recover for loss occasioned to the plaintiff by reason of failure of defendant to deliver certain refrigerator cars.
1Opinion of the Court
Boyce, J.,
charging the jury:
Gentlemen of the jury:—We decline to give you binding instructions to find for the defendant.
This is an action of assumpsit, brought by David C. Williams, the plaintiff, against the Armour Car Lines, the defendant company, to recover, by way of damages, for an alleged loss which the plaintiff claims he has sustained by reason of the neglect or refusal of the defendant company to deliver to him, at Frankford, *276in this County, on the 25th day of May, A. D. 1903, two refrigerator cars for the purpose of loading and shipping strawberries, in accordance with an…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. WSMW Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
- Superior Tube Co. v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
- Safe Harbor Fishing Club v. Safe Harbor Realty Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Safe Harbor Fishing Club v. Safe Harbor Realty Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Vander Zyl v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922