Duperier v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. The appellant moved to suppress physical evidence prior to trial, but he failed to object when it was introduced at trial. Thus, he has waived his right to appellate review. Baglio v. State, 467 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Deluca v. State, 384 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). For a comprehensive discussion of this issue, see Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (1927).
*977We find no error in the remaining points raised.
LETTS, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robertson v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- DeLuca v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Baglio v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fripp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Jaggers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003