Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Beaird

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1939No. 6 Div. 484Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The appellant in the application insists upon questions not stressed in brief oh submission of the case, and ordinarily we would not consider these questions, but appellee has consented and joined in the request that they be considered.

The decree appealed' from was rendered by the circuit court under the Declaratory Judgment Act, Acts 1935, p. 777, and the decree adjudged and declared:

“(1) The respondent and cross complainant has power and authority to issue and sell the said new warrants in the manner, for the purposes and at the price referred to in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Isbell v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. MauterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Dane v. McArthurSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Werborn v. PinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Wilson v. IsbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API