Legal Opinion

Powell v. Allan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1925No. Docket No. 4788PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel respondents, city officials of the city of Los Angeles, to deliver to petitioner certain street improvement bonds.

By proceedings regularly had under the Street Improvement Act of 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 954), a written contract was entered into on April 2, 1920, between the city of Los Angeles and petitioner’s assignor, one John Hayes, whereby the latter, as the contractor, undertook to construct for the sum of $995,773.21 a tunnel in the city of Los Angeles, commonly referred to as the Second Street tunnel. Thereafter assessments were levied…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. BittySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Hubbell v. HigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. McCormack v. PatchinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Coelho v. TruckellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Hartman v. Merged Area VI Community CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. People v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API