Legal Opinion
Fisher v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 4, 2002No. 3D02-535PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
824 So.2d 1050 (2002)
Michael FISHER, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D02-535.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
September 4, 2002.
Michael Fisher, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
2Per curiam
Michael Fisher appeals the denial of his rule 3.800 motion for post-conviction relief. We reverse because the trial court should have held an evidentiary hearing rather than summarily denying Fisher's motion.
Fisher claims that his attorney advised him that he…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. LerouxSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Rensoli v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
4Cited by8 opinions
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Collazo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Jordan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Dobarganes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.