State v. Kafka
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceZastrow, Justice
Inasmuch as State v. O’Connor, 1972, 86 S.D. 294, 194 N.W.2d 246 concluded that SDCL 22-32-16 (misdemeanor breaking and entering) could not be a “necessarily included offense” of SDCL 22-32-9 (third degree burglary) as a matter of law, I feel that the proper determination of a “necessarily included offense” should be discussed.*
There are two tests for determining whether an offense is “necessarily included” in a greater offense: (1) legal and (2) factual. Both tests must be satisfied before a “necessarily included offense” instruction should be given.
The legal test of a “necessarily included…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. O'CONNORSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. KarasekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. MyottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. GoodaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. GardnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972