Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Kafka

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1978No. 12246Published

1ConcurrenceZastrow, Justice

Inasmuch as State v. O’Connor, 1972, 86 S.D. 294, 194 N.W.2d 246 concluded that SDCL 22-32-16 (misdemeanor breaking and entering) could not be a “necessarily included offense” of SDCL 22-32-9 (third degree burglary) as a matter of law, I feel that the proper determination of a “necessarily included offense” should be discussed.*

There are two tests for determining whether an offense is “necessarily included” in a greater offense: (1) legal and (2) factual. Both tests must be satisfied before a “necessarily included offense” instruction should be given.

The legal test of a “necessarily included…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. O'CONNORSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. KarasekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. State v. MyottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. GoodaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. GardnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API