Blume v. American Motorist Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NESBITT, Judge.
Blume, the insured commenced this action for a declaratory judgment that the defendant insurance company be required to pay 100% of the insured medical bills— 80% out of available personal injury protection (PIP) coverage and 20% out of available medical payments coverage — even though all available personal injury coverage had not been exhausted. After a non-jury trial, the court entered a judgment in favor of the defendant. We affirm.
The policy in dispute contains separate declarations for medical coverage payment and PIP. Under the PIP benefits, the insurer was required to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holloway v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Moylan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. FicheraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bolden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Neasman v. USAA Casualty Insurance, Florida County Courts1988