Legal Opinion

Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. Kittinger

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 16, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

Appellees brought tbis fiction to recover of appelT lant $575.00 as damages for tbe injury and destruction of their corn, sorghum and wheat crops planted in 1909. It appears that appellant constructed a railroad across the lands of appellees in 1896, which went through a bottom and across a creek in a diagonal course. The testimony shows that the lands of appellees were higher on each side of and nest to the creek than hack from it a dis*644tance. To be more explicit there was a depression on each side of and a distance from the creek, along which water…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Welter v. CurrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Caudill v. BernheimCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SaulsberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Cahill v. Adams & SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Leisl v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API