Madisonville, Hartford & Eastern Railroad v. Kittinger
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Nunn
Affirming.
Appellees brought tbis fiction to recover of appelT lant $575.00 as damages for tbe injury and destruction of their corn, sorghum and wheat crops planted in 1909. It appears that appellant constructed a railroad across the lands of appellees in 1896, which went through a bottom and across a creek in a diagonal course. The testimony shows that the lands of appellees were higher on each side of and nest to the creek than hack from it a dis*644tance. To be more explicit there was a depression on each side of and a distance from the creek, along which water…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Welter v. CurrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Caudill v. BernheimCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SaulsberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Cahill v. Adams & SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Leisl v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935