Legal Opinion

General Accident Insurance v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent Bailey, the insured, contends that Supreme *925Court erred in staying arbitration of her claim that she is entitled to recover the full amount of coverage under the underinsured motorist endorsement of her policy without any offset for monies paid by her insurer (General Accident) under the liability provisions of the policy. Petitioner General Accident argues that, since it has paid $50,000 to Bailey under Part A (the liability coverage of that policy), then, in accordance with the provisions of the underinsured motorist…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. MATTER OF VALENTE v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fazio v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Arbitration between CNA Insurance & GrandstaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. In re Arbitration between Exchange InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. United States Fire Insurance v. FotinakosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. National Ass'n of Independent Insurers v. CurialeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API