Legal Opinion

Hodnett v. Harmon

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 9, 1988No. Civ. 6143PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Judge.

The plaintiff appeals, contending that the trial court’s award of damages is inadequate.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for injuries he received when the defendant shot him in the leg. Following an ore tenus trial, the circuit court entered a judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $7,500.

As indicated, the plaintiff appeals, contending primarily that the trial court’s award of $7,500 was inadequate in light of the evidence. We affirm.

The plaintiff contends that he presented evidence establishing that he suffered a substantial injury as a result of the defendant’s assault…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clardy v. Capital City Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Aplin v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Lartigue v. FlemingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. DeBuys v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Jackson v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hooks v. PettawayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API