Legal Opinion

City of Miami Beach v. Mr. Samuel's, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 6, 1976No. 75-816PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The City of Miami Beach was the respondent to a petition for mandamus brought by Mr. Samuel’s, Inc., seeking an *48order requiring the City to issue to the petitioner a pawnbroker’s license for the pawning of jewelry. The City appeals a final judgment issuing the peremptory writ. We affirm.

The City provides for pawnbrokers’ licenses and sets the fee for such licenses. The zoning ordinance does not, by its expressed terms, mention pawnbrokers in any zoning classification. Mr, Samuel’s, Inc., applied for the license in a “C-4” zone which is described in the ordinance: “A. DISTRICT…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Harris v. GoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Johnson v. AlexanderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Miami Beach v. Mr. Samuel's, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. City of Miami Beach v. Mr. Samuel's Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API