Commonwealth v. Gaither
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*56PRICE, Judge:
On January 14, 1975, the appellant was convicted by a jury of possessing a controlled substance (heroin) with the intent to manufacture or deliver, and carrying a firearm without a license. On this direct appeal, appellant contends that his trial counsel was ineffective.1 We affirm.
The Commonwealth’s case consisted of the testimony of three Harrisburg policemen. The policemen testified that as a result of a conversation with an informant, they proceeded to the J. J. Bar on North Third Street. There, they observed appellant’s parked automobile. After a search of the area around…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WalleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. YarboughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. GaitherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976