Legal Opinion

Senna v. Walter Florimont & 2400 Amusements, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 22, 2008No. A-35 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

In this case, we once again address the degree to which speech, even speech that may disseminate falsehoods damaging the reputation of a person, should be protected from a defamation lawsuit. Balancing the right to speak freely and the right to be secure in one’s good name — determining how much protection should be given to speech at the expense of reputation — is at the heart of this case.

In a general defamation case, a plaintiff claiming to be damaged by a false statement will succeed if he shows that the speaker acted negligently in failing to ascertain the truth of the statement.…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. G.D. v. KennySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. W.J.A. v. D.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  3. State v. BurkertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. Ramos v. FlowersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  5. Salzano v. North Jersey Media Group Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API