Legal Opinion

Rahi v. Fang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), *14entered January 24, 1996, which, in an action for personal injuries against defendants driver and owner of a vehicle that collided with plaintiffs vehicle, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court correctly held that for purposes of the Statute of Limitations, defendant owner is united in interest with defendant driver (CPLR 203 [b], [c]; Jordan v Westhill Cent. School Dist., 42 AD2d 1043; cf., Grossman v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 178 AD2d 323). Since…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reporter Co. v. TomickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Jordan v. Westhill Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Grossman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alamo v. Citident, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Lig Shing Zee v. Hwa-Min HsuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API