Matter of Lyman
New York Court of Appeals
Motion for reargument of case reported in volume 160 Hew York Reports, at page 96.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The counsel for the commissioner of excise have applied for the reargument of this case. The motion papers seem to admit that the decision is right, and the only purpose of the motion is to correct some errors that it is said inhere in the reasons upon which the decision was based, and to show that so far as the opinion asserts that the. right to revoke a tax certificate depends upon a criminal conviction, it is based upon an erroneous construction of the statute.
It is not the usual practice to permit rearguments in this court for the purpose of correcting some error in the reasoning of the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Chase National Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- In re LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Cribbs v. SturmanTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1933
- Lash v. MillerOhio Probate Court · 1939