Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wirges v. Bean

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 1964No. 5-3183, 5-3242, and 5-3252Published

1DissentGeorge Rose Smith, J.

It seems to me that in Case No. 3242, the ex parte appeal, the majority are taking an altogether unrealistic position in holding that Wirges should have filed a conventional lawsuit against the court reporter, with a formal complaint, service summons, time for answer, and so forth. I find nothing in our prior decisions that lays down such a requirement.

Wirges filed a motion asking that the court reporter be directed to make available a transcript of the proceedings of March 19, 1963. In substance that motion amounted to exactly the same thing as an application for mandamus. The stenographer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API