Legal Opinion

Farrall v. District of Columbia Amateur Athletic Union

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 25, 1946No. 9084PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Associate Justice.

Appellants are Negro members of the District of Columbia Amateur Athletic Union. As plaintiffs in the District Court, they brought civil action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, praying for injunction and declaratory judgment. Defendants were the Union and the members of its Registration Committee. The controversy centers about a provision inserted by the defendant Committee in “sanctions” issued by it for amateur athletic events in the District of Columbia, stating that the Committee does not sanction mixed racial competition or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Mexico Light & Power Co. v. MunchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. National War Labor Board v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  3. Burman v. Lenkin Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. Rogers v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  5. Callaway v. Hamilton Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API