Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided December 4, 1997No. 06-97-00017-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Muhammad Lutharius Young appeals from a conviction for attempted murder, with an affirmative finding of a deadly weapon. A jury found Young guilty, and the trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment.

Young appeals his conviction in two points of error. First, Young contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, Young contends that his trial counsel erred in failing to present the defense of necessity and in failing to object to inadmissible evidence. Second, Young contends that the evidence is legally and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Auston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. Howard Thomas Douglas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API