Legal Opinion
Saechao v. Prime Recovery LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 26, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01723Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MEY SAECHAO, No. 2:19-cv-1723 KJM DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PRIME RECOVERY LLC a/k/a PRIME RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter came before the undersigned on December 13, 2019, pursuant to Local Rule 19 302(c)(19), for hearing of plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 12.) Attorney Majdi 20 Hijazin appeared telephonically on behalf of the plaintiff. No appearance was made on behalf of 21 the defendant. At that time, oral argument was heard and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.