Legal Opinion

People v. Staton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At trial, the defendant did not specify why the charge as to alibi as given was inadequate; therefore the claimed error was not preserved for our review as a matter of law (see, People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022, 1023). In any event, a review of the alibi charge convinces us that it did, indeed, unequivocally convey the People’s burden to disprove an alibi beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Victor, 62 NY2d 374). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; People v Arce, 42 NY2d 179, 187). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. ArceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. HokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. VictorNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HollingsworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. HandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. PilgrimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. PilgrimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API