Legal Opinion

Cutts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1922No. 13513Published

Indictment for possessing liquor; from Mitchell superior court • — Judge E. C. Bell. January 14, 1922.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case contains the general grounds only. “A verdict supported by any evidence and approved by the trial judge can not be set aside by this court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82 (105 S. E. 377.) See Cutts v. State, ante, 678.

*679Decided June 14, 1922. Indictment for possessing liquor; from Mitchell superior court • — Judge E. C. Bell. January 14, 1922. Charles Watt, for plaintiff in error. B. C. Gardner, solicitor-general, Billie B. Bush, C. E. Crow, contra.

Under the rulings in the above cases, the judgment in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Townsend v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API