Legal Opinion

LaLone v. Carlin

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith (Edward N.), J.

The causes of action arose out of a collision in the intersection of Phelps and Cooper streets in the city of Watertown on the 27th day of May, 1930, between two automobiles, one driven by the defendant Richard T. Carlin and the other driven by one Edward W. LaLone. • Carlin was driving his car in a westerly direction over Phelps street and LaLone was driving his car in a northerly direction over Cooper street.

The affidavit in favor of the motion is sufficient to raise the question as to whether the accident was not the result of concurring negligences; it goes farther…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haines v. Bero Engineering Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Hejza v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Best v. YerkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. General Taxicab Ass'n v. O'SheaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Neiman-Marcus Co. v. LaitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Shaw v. CrisseyNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Blauvelt v. Village of NyackNew York Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API