Legal Opinion

Kaufmann ex rel. Kaufmann v. Nagle

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 9, 1991No. 72946PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The claim of plaintiff Cynthia Kaufmann for personal injury and the parental claim of her mother, plaintiff Henrietta Kauf-mann, were submitted to the jury under instructions patterned upon MAI 3d 17.16 —Rear End Collision. Upon jury verdicts, judgments were entered in their favor. Upon the appeal of defendant Kimberly Nagle, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, held the evidence did not support the submission of those claims under the rear-end collision doctrine. It reversed those judgments. The case was transferred for consideration by this Court as though on original appeal,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. Central States Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Barlow v. ThornhillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Witherspoon v. GuttierezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Feinstein v. McGuireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Black v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hagen v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Nishwitz v. BlosserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Clark v. Belfonte Distributing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Manny Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. McConnell v. StallingsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API