Legal Opinion

Rosasco v. Thompson

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided May 4, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel in personam by one Rosasco against S. K. Thompson and others. On suggestion by Palmer Pillans, as amicus curiae, that the attachment should be discharged.

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, District Judge.

This was a libel in personam, filed by Rosasco against Thompson et al., alleging that the defendants were all nonresidents, for the breach of a charter party by Thompson et al. The prayer asks to have process in due form of law, according to the practice of this court in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, against the defendants, naming them, and, if they cannot be found, that an attachment may issue against their goods and chattels, and for relief.

Libelants moved for and were granted an attachment by the court, and now comes Palmer Pillans, as amicus curias,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Manro v. AlmeidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. Devoe Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Steam Stone-Cutter Co. v. SearsUnited States Circuit Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. NunesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1962
  4. Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API