Guldager v. Rockwell

Richmond, O.

In this action plaintiff in error seeks to recover from defendant in error damages for negli*460gence, resulting in the death of her husband while in the employ of the defendant in error. The complaint, as amended, contains the usual and necessary averments, to which the defendant in error answers, setting up three defenses: First. A general denial. Second. Contributory negligence. Third. Accord and satisfaction. The second and third defenses are specifically denied in the reply of plaintiff in error.

The cause was tried to a jury, and after all the evidence had been submitted on the…