Legal Opinion

State v. Nagel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1999No. Nos. 97-2120 and 97-2274PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue for our consideration is whether the requirements of R.C. 2945.05 apply to requests made by a defendant pursuant to former R.C. 2941.142 and 2941.143 to have the trial judge, in a case tried by a jury, determine guilt or innocence on prior-conviction specifications. For the reasons that follow, we find that R.C. 2945.05 does not apply to such requests. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on that issue, and we reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

Former R.C. 2941.142 provided that “[i]mposition of a term of actual incarceration upon an offender pursuant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PlessOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. CroomOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. BoydOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API