Legal Opinion

Fries v. Fries

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion by appellant *980for poor person relief and for an extension of time to perfect appeal denied. Memorandum: Appellant has failed to show that he has served the notice of motion upon the County Attorney and has failed to set forth facts so that the merit to his appeal can be ascertained (see, CPLR 1101 [a], [c]; Matter of Teeter v Reed, 57 AD2d 735). Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Teeter v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977