Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 14, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-3458PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Shapiro (“Shapiro”), formerly an employee of the United States, has filed this action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, (“Tort Claims Act”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. contending that he suffered injury because the United States was slow in rendering to him an opinion as to conflicts of interest which might inhibit his employment in the private practice of law in Philadelphia. The Government has filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that Shapiro’s claim is expressly barred by two provisions of the Act, 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Laird v. NelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Eugene Dupree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Coastwise Packet Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Art metal-u.s.a., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Long v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Kaphy Long v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990