State Mutual Life Insurance v. Haynes
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on insurance policies; from city court of Floyd county— Judge Nunn ally. May 21, 1917. The action was on two life-insurance policies in which the plaintiff was named as beneficiary. Liability was denied on the ground that the policies had lapsed because of non-payment of premiums.
Read the full summary
Action on insurance policies; from city court of Floyd county— Judge Nunn ally. May 21, 1917. The action was on two life-insurance policies in which the plaintiff was named as beneficiary. Liability was denied on the ground that the policies had lapsed because of non-payment of premiums. The following facts appear from admissions in the pleadings and the agreed statement of facts: The policies were dated November 5, 1906, and were for $5,000 each, and provided for the payment, of premiums in advance, either annually, semi-annually, or quarterly, at the following rates: annual premium $191.70;…
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
Upon the agreed statement of facts as submitted to the judge, who by agreement heard the case without'a jury, the judgment in favor of the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence. The issues in this *49case are controlled adversely to the contentions of the plaintiff in error by the decision of this court in State Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Forrest, 19 Ga. App. 296 (91 S. E. 428).
Decided March 14, 1918. Action on insurance policies; from city court of Floyd county— Judge Nunn ally. May 21, 1917. The action was on two life-insurance policies in which the plaintiff was named as beneficiary.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Mutual Life Insurance v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- McEachern v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Blalock v. Empire Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913