Legal Opinion

People v. Gary O.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1978No. Docket Nos. 3707, 3682PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

Statement of the Case and Facts

Petitioner’s appeal and habeas corpus petition have been consolidated for hearing. Since we reverse the judgment, the habeas corpus petition is rendered moot.

The pertinent facts are as follows: On September 9, 1977, a petition was filed in the Kern County Juvenile Court alleging that appellant, aged 17, came within Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. It was alleged in count I that appellant had violated Health and Safety Code section 11359 (possession of marijuana for sale), in count II that he violated Penal Code section 484 (petty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re Ronald E.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Fain v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. SearcieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MorteraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. In re Albert W.California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API