State ex rel. Phillips v. Eighmy

Brad Parker Phillips (“Relator”) sought a writ of prohibition (“the petition”) barring the Honorable Eric Eighmy (“Respondent”) from ordering Relator to serve “forty-eight hours [of] imprisonment” based on Respondent’s conclusion that section 577.010.4 “requires mandatory jail time” in any case (like Relator’s) where a suspended imposition of sentence (“SIS”) is ordered.1 Relator’s single point relied on claims he “is entitled to an order prohibiting Respondent from requiring Relator to serve forty-eight hours incarceration based ... solely on Respondent’s interpretation” that section 577.10…