Legal Opinion

Wright v. Peet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Kent Circuit. were stopped by the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, Ch. J:

The defendant seeks to reduce the amount of a purchase money mortgage by showing that he was defrauded in the purchase by false representations regarding the lands and crops thereon. The purchase was made in 1867, and the mortgage was not given until 1872. As defendant had possession of the premises immediately after the purchase, he discovered at once any deception that had been practiced upon him, and his duty was to make prompt complaint. So far from doing so, he made no complaint until after the giving of the mortgage. That was too late.—DeArmand v. Phillips, Walk. Ch., 186;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whiting v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Higgins v. LansinghIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Eames v. ManleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Damm v. VincentMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API