Legal Opinion

In re Golden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1955Published

1Opinion of the Court

—■ Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified so as to eliminate from the first decretal provision the concluding words “but this increase in respondent’s rent is to take effect only as of December 1, 1954,” without costs of this appeal. There was no warrant in law or in the exercise of discretion for fixing the effective date of the fair rental value other than the “ date [of] the application to the supreme court ” (L. 1945, ch. 314, § 4, subd. 1, as amd.; Matter of Flatto [Sandler], 279 App. Div. 714; Matter of FrmJcel [Fder], 277 App. Div. 968). Settle order. Present — Peck, P.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re FlattoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API