Legal Opinion
Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Application Art Laboratories Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 14, 1992No. 91 Civ. 1366 (VLB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dillard Department Stores Inc. (“Dillard”), an owner and operator of department stores in the United States, brought this action for a declaratory judgment of patent invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement with respect to United States’ Patent Number 4,021,891 (the “891 Patent”) against Application Art Laboratories Company (“Application Art”) and Randolph-Rand Corporation (“Randolph-Rand”). The 891 Patent concerns a magnetic locking device which is utilized on women’s handbags and similar items.
Application Art, á…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Agency Rent A Car System, Inc. v. Grand Rent A Car Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Agency Rent A Car System, Inc. v. Grand Rent A Car Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996