Legal Opinion

Nissel v. Pearce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1988No. USDC Civil 87-886-PA; SC S34984Published

1Opinion of the Court

764 P.2d 224 (1988)

307 Or. 102

Charles Eugene NISSEL, II, Plaintiff,

v.

Fred PEARCE, Sheriff for Multnomah County and Multnomah County, Defendants.

USDC Civil 87-886-PA; SC S34984.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 12, 1988.

Decided November 16, 1988.

Wendy Squires, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for plaintiff.

H.H. Lazenby, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for defendants. With him on the brief was Laurence Kressel, County Counsel for Multnomah County, Oregon.

Before PETERSON, C.J., LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON, JONES, GILLETTE, JJ., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J. Pro Tem.

PETERSON,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. State v. Cruz-MataArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Munden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API