Legal Opinion

Nduwimana v. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 14, 2020No. 18-1690Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-1690 Nduwimana v. Barr BIA Reid, IJ A213 045 920 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Victor Paul v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Sk Shahriair Majidi v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Jian Hui Shao v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Xiu Xia Lin v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API