Legal Opinion

Goad v. Corrington

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 3, 1916No. 8415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Rio Grande District Court. Hon, Chas. C. Holbrook, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

On and prior to the first day of June, Roy Dowdell, Charles C. Banner, J. Crosby and Clarence Day, a Co-partnership doing business under the firm name of the Monte Vista Realty Company, were the owners of a certain automobile. This firm was engaged in the real estate business, and the machine seems to have been used by it in the transaction of its business.

Under an execution issued out of the County Court, in favor of one E. J. Palmer, and against the members of the said realty company, the plaintiff in error, J. Frank Goad, as sheriff of the county, levied upon the automobile as the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook v. MannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  2. Austin v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fish v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Sweetland v. Oakley State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Goad v. WellendorfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Chavez v. HaynieSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Fish v. EastCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API