Russell v. Geyser-Marion Gold Mining Company
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALLISTER, Justice:
This case arises from a dispute over some grazing rights. The plaintiffs, Mervin J. Russell and his wife, brought suit to quiet title in some grazing rights against the defendants, Geyser-Marion Gold Mining Company and The Bothwell Corporation. The trial court held that the plaintiffs were entitled to the exclusive right to use the surface of each of the described mining claims for livestock grazing purposes, so long as such grazing was done in a manner not to interfere with any mining of the defendants. From that decision the defendants seek reversal based on insufficient…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wood v. ASHBYUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Western Development Company v. NellUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Clotworthy v. ClydeUtah Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Hartman v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Colman v. ButkovichUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. Lloyd R. StubbsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991