Legal Opinion

Russell v. Geyser-Marion Gold Mining Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1967No. 10577PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

This case arises from a dispute over some grazing rights. The plaintiffs, Mervin J. Russell and his wife, brought suit to quiet title in some grazing rights against the defendants, Geyser-Marion Gold Mining Company and The Bothwell Corporation. The trial court held that the plaintiffs were entitled to the exclusive right to use the surface of each of the described mining claims for livestock grazing purposes, so long as such grazing was done in a manner not to interfere with any mining of the defendants. From that decision the defendants seek reversal based on insufficient…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. ASHBYUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Western Development Company v. NellUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Clotworthy v. ClydeUtah Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hartman v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Colman v. ButkovichUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States v. Lloyd R. StubbsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API