Legal Opinion

Industrial Rayon Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenues

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1938No. 7324PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner was the owner of the Fibre Throwing & Dyeing Company, which was engaged independently of the petitioner in the business of manufacturing and dyeing. For a time the subsidiary prospered, but running into hard times in 1925 it rapidly declined until in December of 1926, when it was compelled to cease its manufacturing and selling business. During the preceding year its board of directors had made repeated efforts to dispose of the properties of the company but had failed. In January of 1927 the company was heavily in debt to the Industrial Fibre Company,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gowen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  2. Denman v. BrumbackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Morton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. Charles W. Steadman and Dorothy F. Steadman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  3. Charles A. Polizzi and Angela Polizzi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Charles A. Polizzi v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  4. Bartlett v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  5. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. HarrisonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API