Legal Opinion

Kurtin v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 30, 1956No. Docket No. 51666Published

Losses on sales of butter futures entered into to protect taxpayers against decline in the price of cheese purchased under forward contracts at a fixed price, held, on the facts, to be allowable in full as hedging transactions.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert Kurtin and Patricia Bristol Kurtin, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Kurtin v. Commissioner

Docket No. 51666

United States Tax Court

26 T.C. 958; 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 104;

August 30, 1956, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Losses on sales of butter futures entered into to protect taxpayers against decline in the price of cheese purchased under forward contracts at a fixed price, held, on the facts, to be allowable in full as hedging transactions.

Bernard Weiss, Esq., for the petitioners.

A. Jesse Duke, Jr., Esq., for the respondent.

Opper, Judge.

OPPER

Res…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Trenton Cotton Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  3. Corn Products Refining Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Kurtin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API