Legal Opinion

Warshall v. Price

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 14, 1993No. 92-2527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

Before any trial has been held and any final judgment entered, a motion for the appointment of a receiver of the property of the defendant is a drastic matter constituting a taking of property and requires a showing of exigent circumstances. Electro Mechanical Products Inc. v. Borona, 324 So.2d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). After a plaintiff has acquired a money judgment against a defendant who carries on business as a sole proprietorship, the situation has changed.

The reasons for arguing against a receiver have disappeared. After all, the judgment creditor can now simply send the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Electro Mechanical Products, Inc. v. BoronaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. CramerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Dana Entertainment, Inc. v. Tucan & Baru Brickell, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. ZAHAV REFI, LLC, ZAHAV FLORIDA, LLC, ZAHAV REFI I I, LLC, SP POOL 7 ZAHAV FL, LLC, BOG TWELVE ZAHAV FL, LLC, AND POOL7 ZAHAV FLORIDA, LLC v. WHITE HAWK ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API